But the 6D does have the clear advantage. Next we look at the shadow areas, to me this is the most important for night landscapes.
The foreground is extremely underexposed, causing significant noise. Again, the 6D has a significant advantage. In the next image I pushed the Shadows adjustment to in Lightroom to see what detail could be pulled from the shadows, which I often do myself. Now the 6D starts walking away from the D But wait, the dynamic range on the D is supposed to be light years ahead of the 6D?
An important thing to keep in mind when looking at dynamic range numbers is that they test at ISO , this has no translation to ISO Time to push these cameras a bit farther, ISO 12, now. This is considered out of spec on the Nikon and is called H1. The image out of the D is getting questionable, it may be usable in some situations, but I would avoid using this ISO.
The 6D is still looking quite clean though. Now up to ISO 25, But the 6D is looking similar to what the D was at 12,, potentially usable still. As you can see the images are very close. I would say the 6D has about a 1.
I can see myself regularly shooting at ISO 12, when needed. The colors produced by the 6D are consistently better to my eye. I have been a devoted Nikon shooter since I started, I shot with the D for a few months this summer and was quite pleased with it shooting at night. The 6D Mark II has on-sensor phase detect pixels , which results in fast and reliable autofocus acquisition even during live view operation.
Consistent information on actual sensor performance is available from DXO Mark for many cameras. Of the two cameras under consideration, the D has a markedly higher DXO score than the 6D Mark II overall score 9 points higher , which will translate into better image quality. The advantage is based on 0. The table below summarizes the physical sensor characteristics and sensor quality findings and compares them across a set of similar cameras.
Many modern cameras are not only capable of taking still images, but can also record movies. The two cameras under consideration both have sensors whose read-out speed is fast enough to capture moving pictures, but the 6D Mark II provides a higher frame rate than the D Apart from body and sensor, cameras can and do differ across a variety of features.
The latter is useful for getting a clear image for framing even in brightly lit environments. On the other hand, the viewfinder of the 6D Mark II has a higher magnification 0. The table below summarizes some of the other core capabilities of the Canon 6D Mark II and Nikon D in connection with corresponding information for a sample of similar cameras. One differentiating feature between the two cameras concerns the touch sensitivity of the rear screen.
Touch control can be particularly helpful, for example, for setting the focus point. This enables the photographer to capture time lapse sequences, such as flower blooming, a sunset or moon rise, without purchasing an external camera trigger and related software. The D features dual card slots , which can be very useful in case a memory card fails. In contrast, the 6D Mark II only has one slot. For some imaging applications, the extent to which a camera can communicate with its environment can be an important aspect in the camera decision process.
The table below provides an overview of the connectivity of the Canon EOS 6D Mark II and Nikon D and, in particular, the interfaces the cameras and selected comparators provide for accessory control and data transfer. Wifi can be a very convenient means to transfer image data to an off-camera location. In contrast, the D has been discontinued but can be found pre-owned on eBay. As a replacement in the same line of cameras, the D was succeeded by the Nikon D Further information on the two cameras e.
So how do things add up? Which camera is better? The listing below highlights the relative strengths of the two models. If the number of relative strengths bullet points above is taken as a guide, the 6D Mark II is the clear winner of the match-up 15 : 7 points. Overview Prices Reviews Specs. Scroll down for more details. Which are the most popular comparisons? Cheap alternatives 1. Write a review. Features Build quality Video quality 7.
Controls Low-light performance Autofocus Highest score Lowest score Most helpful Most recent Oldest. Design 1. Flip-out screens can be useful for tricky shots.
The device is protected with extra seals to prevent failures caused by dust, raindrops, and water splashes. The focus motor moves the lens in order to autofocus. For system cameras, having a focus motor in the camera's body allows you to use a wide range of lenses, including lenses which do not have their own focus motor. For compact cameras, a focus motor is usually built-in. The device is dustproof and water-resistant. Water-resistant devices can resist the penetration of water, such as powerful water jets, but not being submerged into water.
An optical viewfinder or OVF allows the photographer to compose a shot while seeing exactly what the lens will capture. OVFs have no time lag and require no power - as opposed to electronic viewfinders, which can drain battery life. OVFs are also better in low light situations. With less than full coverage, you may have to crop your photos afterward to get them looking perfect. We consider a lower weight better because lighter devices are more comfortable to carry.
A lower weight is also an advantage for home appliances, as it makes transportation easier, and for many other types of products. A hot shoe can be used to attach an external flash, as well as light meters, viewfinders, rangefinders and other attachments. Resolution is an essential indicator of a screen's image quality, representing the maximum amount of pixels that can be shown on the screen.
The resolution is given as a compound value, comprised of horizontal and vertical pixels. Optics 1. Full format. One of the most important aspects of a camera is the size of its sensor.
0コメント